Recently, the Food and Drug Administration recalled the foods from pets after they discovered Salmonella in a number of different products. Salmonella could be said to be a bacteria that has caused pets to feel sick, and they have sometimes become a carrier that will even infect people with this pathogen. When this happens, it leads to what’s known as salmonellosis in humans.
Bill Marler, one of the food safety experts, has been a foodborne illness lawyer as far back as 1993. Pet owners need to understand how this disease spreads, and they should also know what they can do if they notice their furry friend acting strangely. Marler says pet food recalls have happened on a fairly frequent basis, and the FDA has continued to oversee this similar to how they keep a close eye on human food. In many cases, consumers have acted more concerned with the pet’s health than what they do with their own health.
To be fair, the FDA does regulate pet food with an astounding strictness, but with the recent cases in food poisoning, it can seem disappointing with how the FDA didn’t reach a conclusion with this as soon as possible. We have to look at how many recalls have been made on the products. You may not believe it, but the regulations in place for humans exist in the same way for animals. You do, however, have differences like how they get produced can affect the risk of contamination and harming your pets. Some people have thought it strange how human food can be produced with the same level of quality as what you might get with quality dog food. The FDA continues to show concern with human contamination in a direct or indirect way, which has been why they have continued to adopt precautionary measures to keep you safe.
Unfortunately, one of the biggest problems is how the FDA fails to inspect the pet food facilities as often as what safety lawyers might like. In some cases, pet owners might have legal rights if they notice their animals or themselves have become infected. For example, they might be able to charge for the wages lost or the medical expenses as a result of taking care of the children. In addition, there could be compensation for the pain and suffering the person encountered. It depends on how sick the people were as a result of the contaminated pet food.